Pottermark.

Digital presence, intentionally formed.

Open for work

Accessibility

Usable by everyone
is not a feature.

Roughly one in four adults has a disability. An inaccessible site quietly turns away customers who were ready to buy, and exposes the business to complaints it never saw coming. We build to WCAG 2.2 AA as a default, not an upgrade.

Premise

Access and quality are the same problem.

Semantic markup, real contrast, sensible focus order, and honest labels make a site easier for screen readers, keyboards, older eyes, bright sunlight, and search engines — all at once.

Overlay widgets do none of that. We fix the page instead.

Scope

What an accessibility engagement covers.

  • Audit against WCAG 2.2 AA, with automated testing and manual keyboard and screen-reader passes.
  • Prioritised findings: what blocks customers today versus what should be improved next.
  • Remediation: semantic structure, headings, landmarks, labels, alt text, and focus states.
  • Colour and contrast: a palette that stays on-brand and passes.
  • Forms and interaction: error handling, announcements, and motion preferences respected.
  • Documentation: a plain-language statement and guidance for your team.

Standard

WCAG 2.2 AA, ADA in mind.

We work to WCAG 2.2 level AA, the benchmark referenced in most US accessibility complaints and required in public-sector procurement. We are not attorneys and do not offer legal advice; we make the site genuinely conformant and document the work.

Questions

Isn't an accessibility widget enough?
No. Overlays sit on top of the underlying problems and are frequently cited in complaints. Fixing the markup is cheaper and permanent.
Will accessibility limit the design?
It constrains contrast and interaction, not ambition. Every site we build is designed to be striking and conformant at the same time.
Does it help SEO?
Yes. Semantic headings, alt text, labels, and clear structure are exactly what search engines and AI assistants read.

Contact

Let's shape what's next.